‘Harry Potter’ Star Blasts J.Okay. Rowling For Celebrating Anti-Trans Court docket Ruling

The continuing controversy surrounding J.Okay. Rowling‘s views on gender identification has taken one other dramatic flip, as “Harry Potter” star Sean Biggerstaff has publicly known as out the writer.

The outburst got here in response to Rowling celebrating a latest U.Okay. Supreme Court docket ruling that transgender girls will not be legally girls.

Along with Sean Biggerstaff, different stars from “Harry Potter,” together with lead actors Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint, have disagreed with J.Okay. Rowling’s views about trans girls.

J.Okay. Rowling has as soon as once more come below fireplace from a “Harry Potter” alum for her destructive views about trans girls.

This time, she was criticized by Sean Biggerstaff, who starred within the fantasy film franchise as Oliver Wooden.

It started with Rowling sharing a controversial publish of her celebrating a latest U.Okay. Supreme Court docket ruling in opposition to trans girls being legally girls.

Within the publish, Rowling might be seen elevating a glass crammed with what appeared to be alcohol whereas smoking a cigar aboard her $150 million superyacht.

The publish led to her dealing with accusations of “smoking a blunt,” to which the billionaire writer clapped again on social media by firmly clarifying that it was “objectively, provably, and demonstrably a cigar.”

Biggerstaff then responded to her publish, saying, “Bigotry rots the wit.”

Doubling down on his criticism, the Harry Potter star additionally retweeted a publish from a social media person who in contrast the acclaimed writer to Andrew Tate, a crimson tablet influencer recognized for puffing on cigars in a lot of his movies.

“lol, huffing on a cigar now? Is she Andrew Tate?” the tweet learn, per the Each day Mail.

In a distinct publish, Biggerstaff slammed Rowling as an “obsessed billionaire,” exhibiting his distaste concerning the writer allegedly funding the marketing campaign group that introduced the case in opposition to trans girls.

Rowling had first shared an image of the main girls on the case, Susan Smith and Marion Calder, including the comment “in case it wasn’t clear: do not f-ck with Scottish girls.”

Biggerstaff then quoted the publish with, “The vast majority of Scottish girls, who do not agree with these d-ckheads, aren’t being bankrolled by an obsessed billionaire.”

Except for his criticism of Rowling, Biggerstaff additionally expressed assist for trans girls in mild of the controversial Supreme Court docket ruling.

He wrote that the “loudest voices” have been “utilizing concern for sex-based rights as cowl for totally reactionary politics” and known as their behaviour “a efficiency of pragmatism to cloak their instinctive distaste for the Different.”

Up to now, the “Harry Potter” trio, Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint, have additionally disagreed with Rowling’s views concerning the transgender neighborhood.

This has led to them having a strained relationship with Rowling, which culminated together with her brazenly declaring that she couldn’t “forgive” the trio or different celebrities who assist trans folks.

“Celebs who cosied as much as a motion intent on eroding girls’s hard-won rights and who used their platforms to cheer on the transitioning of minors can save their apologies for traumatised detransitioners and susceptible girls reliant on single intercourse areas,” Rowling wrote on X on the time, per the Each day Mail.

“Children have been irreversibly harmed, and 1000’s are complicit, not simply medics, however the superstar mouthpieces, unquestioning media, and cynical firms,” she added later.

Rowling went on to deal with the motion as a scandal whose “penalties” shall be felt for many years and additional doubled down on her criticism of its supporters.

She mentioned, “You probably did all you can to impede and misrepresent analysis. You tried to bully folks out of their jobs for opposing you. Younger folks have been experimented on, left infertile and in ache.”

In a latest publish on X, Rowling appeared to take purpose at Radcliffe, Watson, and Grint over their vocal opposition to her remarks about trans folks.

It started with a publish that requested, “What actor/actress immediately ruins a film for you?”

Rowling then responded with a cryptic comment, quoting the publish and writing, “Three guesses… sorry, that was irresistible.”

She additionally added three laughing emojis to her remark, which has since garnered over 69k likes and 22 million views on the social media platform.