Conflict on Terror — International Points

Response to the September 11, 2001 occasions

With disbelief and shock all over the world individuals noticed the information footage of the occasions on September 11, 2001 when the planes-turned-missiles slammed into the World Commerce Heart towers and into the Pentagon. What might be the worst terrorist assault on america, was completely inexcusable and roundly condemned.

Some 3000 have been killed. Preliminary fears have been that it was over 6000 A lot of elements for this revised quantity, have been mentioned to incorporate preliminary overestimates; a couple of individual reporting the identical lacking individual; heroic rescue operations, and so on. This decrease quantity doesn’t in any means cut back the affect although.)

The next bombing of Afghanistan to assault Osama Bin Laden’s Al Qaeda terrorist community and the Taliban for harboring them has additionally led to some 3,500 civilian deaths, in line with an unbiased research launched initially of December 2001.

The ghastly terrorist assaults led to a combination of political, social and financial response all over the world.

Hatred and anti-Islam sentiment, (with out distinguishing the despotic militants from peculiar Muslims) elevated, regardless that many of the Muslim communities all over the world condemned this act.

Whereas seen efforts have been seen by politicians to attempt to separate terrorists from Muslims basically, it has not been straightforward. On the one hand, after years of financial and geopolitical historical past, there are some facets of mistrust, whereas alternatively, extremists within the Muslim and Christian communities are including to the antagonisms. For instance, throughout the peak of the shock and anger to the September 11 assaults, extremist tendencies within the West resulted in beatings and even killings of Muslims. Even non-Muslims that simply occurred to have lengthy beards or indirectly resembled Taliban/Al Qaeda members have been focused. Others noticed this as proof that Islam is inherently violent or that it’s the major risk to the remainder of the world, and so on. On the Muslim aspect, there have additionally been equally excessive reactions, from assist of those terrorist acts to even being satisfied that this was some type of Zionist conspiracy guilty Muslims! In each circumstances these appear to be a minority of individuals with such excessive views however after all the priority is all the time that it’ll enhance over time.

There was no query that there was going to be some type of retaliation and response from america. One couldn’t have anticipated them severely to chorus from eager to take revenge. But the worry was in what type this revenge could be and the way it could be carried out in addition to what the affect on peculiar Afghans could be, who’ve already suffered by the hands of the Taliban and outdoors forces for years.

As well as, some eight months after the assaults it was revealed within the mainstream press all over the world that the CIA had warned George Bush of the threats weeks earlier than September 11. This precipitated an uproar in lots of locations, together with america Congress, the place members demanded extra data to grasp if all these deaths may have been prevented.

Again to high

Ensuing Conflict on Terror

The horrible occasions of September 11 noticed the appreciable quieting of what was till then rising home and worldwide criticism of the Bush Administration. The September 11 occasions resulted in a struggle on terror which noticed assist for Bush and his recognition soar on the time.

As much as September 11, 2001, the Bush administration was being criticized all over the world for its stances on varied points domestically and internationally. Even European and different allies have been very vital of positions on quite a few world points.

However even earlier than the Bush Administration, all through the world, many countries and teams of individuals had expressed their frustrations at how U.S. overseas insurance policies had affected them on all kinds of points, starting from financial/globalization points which have deepened poverty and/or inequality for most individuals all over the world; geopolitics/arms/missile protection; environmental points and so forth. Protests both immediately, or not directly at U.S. insurance policies have occurred all all over the world—particularly on globalization points—as talked about on this web page. (See the part on world protests for extra on that, for instance).

But that can’t be an excuse for the atrocity of September 11 because it killed many harmless individuals. On the similar time, individuals have appropriately identified that when different areas all over the world have confronted comparable terrorist assaults, the outpouring of concern and condemnation has not been as a lot. The Washington Submit (September 12, 2001) even dared to confess this at such a delicate time shortly after the assaults. (Their article is not on-line.)

Nevertheless, behind the unity of the American individuals within the shock of September 11, a heightened sense of safety resulted with considerations reverberating all through the world. Many have been involved in regards to the ensuing crackdown of freedoms and civil liberties in varied nations. Many frightened that varied nations all over the world would additionally use this struggle on terror as an excuse to pursue extra aggressive choices on their very own residents.

For instance, think about the considerations Amnesty Worldwide raised in October 2001, shortly after the September 11, 2001 assaults: Within the title of combating worldwide terrorism, governments have rushed to introduce draconian new measures that threaten the human rights of their very own residents, immigrants and refugees…. Governments have a accountability to make sure the protection of their residents, however measures taken should not undermine elementary human rights requirements. It seems that a few of the initiatives presently being mentioned or applied could also be used to curb fundamental human rights and to suppress inside opposition. Among the definitions of terrorism beneath dialogue are so broad that they may very well be used to criminalize anybody out of favor with these in energy and criminalize official peaceable train of the precise to freedom of expression and affiliation. They may additionally put in danger the precise to privateness and threaten the rights of minorities and asylum-seekers.

In Might 2003, Amnesty Worldwide charged, The struggle on terror, removed from making the world a safer place, has made it extra harmful by curbing human rights, undermining the rule of worldwide legislation and shielding governments from scrutiny. It has deepened divisions amongst individuals of various faiths and origins, sowing the seeds for extra battle. The overwhelming affect of all that is real worry—among the many prosperous in addition to the poor.

Even within the U.S. a few of the ensuing insurance policies on how suspects shall be handled, on how entry to private data shall be made accessible for safety considerations and so forth, led to debates in any respect ranges on what is taken into account an assault on civil liberties, and what’s cheap for safety. On the overseas coverage enviornment, there was growing concern that the U.S. would have the ability to use the struggle on terror to pursue aggressive insurance policies that have been beforehand criticized by many different individuals. This will vary from financial, to political and even navy insurance policies. The Iraq struggle was one such instance, the place amongst different issues, the priority of terrorism was used to justify a struggle in opposition to Iraq, regardless that the terrorism hyperlinks weren’t actual.

Additionally of significance, with its free definition of terror, there may be concern that the struggle on terror , will even have an effect on all these working truthfully for peace and social justice for all, as even they are going to come beneath scrutiny for maybe appropriately criticizing insurance policies of any variety of nations and organizations all over the world, together with these from the West.

The struggle on terror has in some respects, led to what has been described as a struggle on freedom.

Again to high

Mainstream Media

Whereas residents in all places, particularly People, have been rightly outraged on the assaults, the mainstream media has largely targeting the results, the assorted aftermaths and impacts, and reporting what political leaders are doing, saying or not doing, or not saying, and so on. They’ve additionally reported immense element on a few of the facets of the particular bombing in Afghanistan, and so on. As with most different conflicts in latest historical past although, whereas huge in amount, media reporting seems comparatively missing in depth, historic context, and investigative evaluation on the causes that gasoline such outrageous militant extremism and terrorism.

The so-called vary of discourse then, is sort of slender, however inside it, protection is sort of detailed. The reporting of some facets is certainly very shifting and excellent. There’s, nonetheless, acceptable criticism of some extremism creeping into some facets of the mainstream media as properly, in sure circumstances. Importantly although, our vary of views can be affected by the vary of discourse. That is particularly related now, as residents search solutions on how and why such a horrible atrocity may very well be dedicated. (For extra on the protection of the media, with evaluation and critique of the mainstream media itself, see this web page’s part: Conflict on Terror Mainstream Media and Propaganda)

Again to high

Will violence result in extra violence?

With all of the vivid imagery, we are able to solely now start to think about how different individuals and societies all over the world have suffered in different conditions. With usually worse outcomes, albeit not so sudden and stunning, complete cities/areas have been leveled and/or huge quantity of life has been misplaced in locations like Kosovo, Iraq, Democratic Republic of Congo, East Timor, Hiroshima/Nagasaki, throughout Europe throughout the World Wars, and too many different locations to have the ability to checklist right here.

With the US-led bombing marketing campaign on Afghanistan, there has all the time been an increasing number of concern about civilians being caught within the center. Certainly, by early December 2001, some 3,500 Afghan civilians have been believed to have been killed by U.S. bombing. Moreover, many assist businesses criticized the meals drops for not delivering a lot precise assist and being a token gesture, quite than an efficient one.

Maybe one of many largest fears, voiced earlier than the retaliation began, is that retaliated violence may end in extra retaliated violence and we threat tit-for-tat violence that appears onerous to get out of. In all this, civilians on all sides will all the time be affected. We solely want remind ourselves of that shuddering speech by Osama Bin Laden on his threats of retaliation in opposition to civilians and of assorted hawkish politicians within the West asking for the equal of no mercy. Martin Luther King is value quoting:

But, how does one get out of this vicious circle? After all it isn’t straightforward, and even plenty of the peace motion wrestle on this reply, however maybe if extra voice was given within the media to those broader views, then various ideas may very well be thought-about. True, extra on peace-related options are mentioned in TV boards and debates, however in terms of the precise reporting and one-on-one dialogue and evaluation, the context is restricted to the present actions and choices. The discussions are due to this fact inside these confines, largely.

On the overseas coverage entrance, even latest historical past of the final 50 years or so has been questionable by each Western leaders and Center Japanese leaders. For instance, the assist by the west of brutal leaders within the center east has contributed to an extremist backlash. Of their struggle to get the Soviet Union out of Afghanistan, Osama Bin Laden himself, in addition to different jihadists, have been supported by the US, encouraging the coaching of jihadists and the rise of miltantism to provoke opposition to the communists. Because the article within the earlier hyperlink implies, whereas plainly the lesser of two evils was supported, maybe the long run penalties weren’t totally explored and it does appear that violence and worry breeds extra violence and worry.

Again to high

President Bush dropping the struggle on terror

Again to high

Further articles and hyperlinks

On quite a few fronts there are numerous, many issues occurring which readers have requested me to jot down on. It’s troublesome to maintain up with all of the angles with the view to jot down on all of them. Consequently, for now, till I’m able to catch up, included under, beneath this part on the struggle on terrorism are articles reposted from different websites and authors from all over the world that supply a wide range of deeper and wider views and views. They’re broadly categorized into the sections listed under, though many articles can simply match different classes too.

Additionally, within the Extra Info web page is a rising assortment of hyperlinks and sources to different websites that supply deeper views.

I don’t essentially agree with the entire views of all of the hyperlinks and sources offered, and certainly not are they a complete checklist, quite an instance.

Among the extra mainstream sources focus rather more on the results and aftermaths, whereas a few of the different sources additionally supply deeper evaluation on causes in addition to ramifications all over the world. These websites have extra hyperlinks that you may observe to different websites. Extra websites shall be added as time goes on.

Again to high